Thursday, August 20, 2020

Vygotsky and Social Development Theory

Social Development Theory, a theory formulated by Lev Vygotsky, is a theory which emphasizes on the effect of culture and social factors in contributing to cognitive development. According to Vygotsky, his theory differs from Piaget's as he places more emphasis on culture affecting / shaping cognitive development and he sets more weight on the role of language in cognitive development. Vygotsky believes that community plays a central role in the process of learning. 

The work of Lev Vygotsky (1934) has become the foundation of much research and theory in cognitive development over the past several decades, particularly of what has become known as Social Development Theory.

Vygotsky's theories stress the fundamental role of social interaction in the development of cognition (Vygotsky, 1978), as he believed strongly that community plays a central role in the process of "making meaning."

Unlike Piaget's notion that childrens' development must necessarily precede their learning, Vygotsky argued, "learning is a necessary and universal aspect of the process of developing culturally organized, specifically human psychological function" (1978, p. 90).  In other words, social learning tends to precede (i.e., come before) development.

Vygotsky has developed a sociocultural approach to cognitive development. He developed his theories at around the same time as Jean Piaget was starting to develop his ideas (1920's and 30's), but he died at the age of 38, and so his theories are incomplete - although some of his writings are still being translated from Russian.

 

Vygotsky places more emphasis on culture affecting cognitive development.
  • This contradicts Piaget's view of universal stages and content of development (Vygotsky does not refer to stages in the way that Piaget does).
  • Hence Vygotsky assumes cognitive development varies across cultures, whereas Piaget states cognitive development is mostly universal across cultures.

Vygotsky places considerably more emphasis on social factors contributing to cognitive development.
  • Vygotsky states cognitive development stems from social interactions from guided learning within the zone of proximal development as children and their partner's co-construct knowledge. In contrast, Piaget maintains that cognitive development stems largely from independent explorations in which children construct knowledge of their own.
  • For Vygotsky, the environment in which children grow up will influence how they think and what they think about.

Vygotsky places more and different emphasis on the role of language in cognitive development.
  • According to Piaget, language depends on thought for its development (i.e., thought comes before language). For Vygotsky, thought and language are initially separate systems from the beginning of life, merging at around three years of age, producing verbal thought (inner speech).
  • For Vygotsky, cognitive development results from an internalization of language.
According to Vygotsky adults are an important source of cognitive development.
  • Adults transmit their culture's tools of intellectual adaptation that children internalize. In contrast, Piaget emphasizes the importance of peers as peer interaction promotes social perspective taking.

Piaget: Making Sense of the World

The Theory of Cognitive Development

Cognitive theories focus on how our mental processes or cognitions change over time. The theory of cognitive development is a comprehensive theory about the nature and development of human intelligence first developed by Jean Piaget. It is primarily known as a developmental stage theory, but in fact, it deals with the nature of knowledge itself and how humans come gradually to acquire it, construct it, and use it. Moreover, Piaget claims that cognitive development is at the center of the human organism and language is contingent on cognitive development. Let’s learn more about Piaget’s views about the nature of intelligence and then dive deeper into the stages that he identified as critical in the developmental process.

Jean Piaget
Jean Piaget (1896-1980) is one of the most influential cognitive theorists in development, inspired to explore children’s ability to think and reason by watching his own children’s development. He was one of the first to recognize and map out the ways in which children’s intelligence differs from that of adults. He became interested in this area when he was asked to test the IQ of children and began to notice that there was a pattern in their wrong answers. He believed that children’s intellectual skills change over time that that maturation rather than training brings about that change. Children of differing ages interpret the world differently.

Making sense of the world

Piaget believed that we are continuously trying to maintain cognitive equilibrium or a balance or cohesiveness in what we see and what we know. Children have much more of a challenge in maintaining this balance because they are constantly being confronted with new situations, new words, new objects, etc. When faced with something new, a child may either fit it into an existing framework (schema) and match it with something known (assimilation) such as calling all animals with four legs “doggies” because he or she knows the word doggie, or expand the framework of knowledge to accommodate the new situation (accommodation) by learning a new word to more accurately name the animal. This is the underlying dynamic in our own cognition. Even as adults we continue to try and make sense of new situations by determining whether they fit into our old way of thinking or whether we need to modify our thoughts.

Understanding Schema

A schema is a cognitive framework or concept that helps organize and interpret information. Schemas can be useful because they allow us to take shortcuts in interpreting the vast amount of information that is available in our environment.

However, these mental frameworks also cause us to exclude pertinent information to focus instead only on things that confirm our pre-existing beliefs and ideas. Schemas can contribute to stereotypes and make it difficult to retain new information that does not conform to our established ideas about the world.

Illustration: 

For example, a young girl may first develop a schema for a dog. She knows that a dog is small, has hair, four legs, and a tail. When the little girl encounters a cat for the first time, she might initially call it a dog.

After all, it fits in with her schema for the characteristics of a dog; it is a small animal that has hair, four legs, and a tail. Once she is told that this is a different animal called a cat, she will modify her existing schema for a dog and create a new schema for a cat

Assimilation and Accommodation

Assimilation of knowledge occurs when a learner encounters a new idea, and must ‘fit’ that idea into what they already know. This is the same as filling a container. On the other hand, accommodation of knowledge is more substantial, requiring the learner to reshape those containers.

Illustration

For example, John is a young boy whose family owns a typical native dog (asong pinoy) named Bantay. One day, John visits his grandmother, who has just adopted big bulldog. Even though this new dog looks quite different than John's familiar Bantay, John still recognizes that the bulldog is also a dog. John put the new object -- his grandmother's bulldog -- into an already established category -- 'dog.' The Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget called this assimilation. Let's say John next visited his aunt, who has a cat. John points at the cat and says 'dog!' His concept of dog, which successfully included both Bantay and his grandmother's bulldog, is too broad; he calls anything that has four legs and fur a 'dog.' His father explains that this is a 'cat,' and John adjusts his concept of 'dog' accordingly. This is known as accommodation. Both are part of Piaget's idea of adaptation, or the ways in which children learn about and categorize the world.

Both assimilation and accommodation are related to the idea of schemas. Schemas are simply established patterns used to organize knowledge. Schemas underlie how we think in a lot of ways; for example, stereotyping involves accessing a schema about how one type of person usually acts and using it to predict their behavior. Assimilation and accommodation are the ways that children incorporate new information into their schemas. John filed 'bulldog' under the existing header 'dog,' adding it to his schema of 'dog.' But when John encountered a cat, he learned that his schema of 'dog' shouldn't include all four-legged furry animals, so he adjusted the schema to exclude cats.


References

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.

Dasen, P. (1994). Culture and cognitive development from a Piagetian perspective. In W .J. Lonner & R.S. Malpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture (pp. 145–149). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.


Behaviorist Teaching

        Good teaching meets the needs of every individual student while accomplishing the goals of education. Formerly, a teacher was the conveyor of information. Today, the teacher is as much a facilitator of learning experiences. Many teachers, for example, have found the facilitating role comfortable in high technology classrooms when they find that students know as much or more about various technologies as they do. The demand for excellence in recent years has heaped more and more pressure on teachers to perform.  

The Behaviorist Teacher

Behaviorist teaching is the oldest and most widespread technique and has some definite advantages plus a track record of success. Students who perform well for a behaviorist teacher are "sponges" who consume huge amounts of information and details. They are able to reproduce facts and information precisely on a test. These students do well in mastering factual information and on true/false tests or multiple choice items. They can reproduce the ideas of the teacher in an essay as well as the ideas they have read in texts or other prescribed reading materials. 

Behaviorist teachers often come under attack for concentrating on building "surface learning" of facts rather than building thinkers or problem solvers. They may be accused of having so much interest in the mastery of content that "process" tools of learning ("how to learn" skills) are neglected. Student learning styles may be ignored as the amount to be learned increases.

The behaviorist teacher generally:

  •  Relies on lecture and textbooks as staples of teaching and learning.
  • Is in control of the learning environment. 
  • Takes the role of "sage on the stage." 
  • Understands the ideas of goals and objectives, careful formulation of activities to achieve the objectives, and testing to match the objectives. 
  • Is concerned with delivering a prescribed amount of content to students and expecting them to master it. 
  • Uses testing to determine mastery or lack thereof and grades based on expected mastery.

All of us have encountered behaviorist teachers. We can not deny that some of them are extremely competent in helping learners master content. But there are also those who abuse this perspective of teaching. As the pressure to make students achieve increases, the behaviorist teacher tends to exert more and more control and may increase expectations, raise the amount of homework expected, and seek to increase the amount of content given per time unit. The teacher may also use drill and practice plus repeatable exercises, seeking to maximize the memorization of material connected to a particular discipline.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Revised Bloom's Taxonomy in the Cognitive Domain


In 1956, Benjamin Bloom and other educational psychologists developed a classification system of levels of cognitive skills and learning behavior. The classification they created is often referred to as Bloom's Taxonomy. The word taxonomy means classifications or structures. Bloom's Taxonomy classifies thinking according to six cognitive levels of complexity. The classifications are knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.


In the mid-nineties, Lorin Anderson, a former student of Bloom, revisited the cognitive domain in the learning taxonomy and made some changes, with perhaps the two most prominent ones being, 

(1) changing the names in the six categories from noun to verb forms, and (2) slightly rearranging them.

The new classifications are: remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create.
  • Remembering: Exhibit memory of previously learned material by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers.
    • Verbs: Defines, describes, identifies, knows, labels, lists, matches, names, outlines, recalls, recognizes, reproduces, selects, states

  • Understanding: Demonstrate understanding of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions, and stating main ideas.
    • Verbs: Comprehends, converts, defends, distinguishes, estimates, explains, extends, generalizes, gives an example, infers, interprets, paraphrases, predicts, rewrites, summarizes, translates.
  • Applying: Solve problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques and rules in a different way.
    • Verbs: Applies, changes, computes, constructs, demonstrates, discovers, manipulates, modifies, operates, predicts, prepares, produces, relates, shows, solves, uses.
  • Analyzing: Examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations.
    • Verbs: Analyzes, breaks down, compares, contrasts, diagrams, deconstructs, differentiates, discriminates, distinguishes, identifies, illustrates, infers, outlines, relates, selects, separates.

  • Evaluating: Present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas, or quality of work based on a set of criteria. 
    • Verbs: Appraises, compares, concludes, contrasts, criticizes, critiques, defends, describes, discriminates, evaluates, explains, interprets, justifies, relates, summarizes, supports.
 
  • Creating: Compile information together in a different way by combining elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions.
    • Verbs: Categorizes, combines, compiles, composes, creates, devises, designs, explains, generates, modifies, organizes, plans, rearranges, reconstructs, relates, reorganizes, revises, rewrites, summarizes, tells, writes.





 

Thursday, August 6, 2020

PRINCIPLES OF HIGH QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Assessment plays an important role in the process of learning and motivation. The types of assessment tasks that we ask our students to do determine how students will approach the learning task and what study behaviors they will use. In the words of higher education scholar John Biggs, “What and how students learn depends to a major extent on how they think they will be assessed.” (1999, p. 141).
        
Classroom assessment involves teachers investigating what and how their students are learning as teaching takes place, typically through short questions given out at the end of each class, as opposed to seeing the outcomes of student learning at the end of teaching when there is no longer the opportunity to change teaching practice. 

Assess comes from the Latin verb ‘assidere’ meaning ‘to sit with’.  In assessment, one should sit with the learner. This implies it is something we do with and for students and not to students (Green, 1998).

Assessment should possess qualities efficiently reflect students’ performance. It is very important for teachers to adhere to the principles of high quality assessment since these are means for obtaining data and information about each student’s extent of learning. If these are not present, then the evaluation and assessment would be questionable. It will also not give clear answers as to whether or not instructional objectives and goals are met. 

High quality assessment is not just about giving grades to students. At its best, high-quality assessment provides actionable information to inform curriculum and instruction decisions and allows for a real-time change of course to meet students' needs. The first step is to plan and design relevant, standards-based assessments that are used at many different stages of learning. From there, teachers should approach the resulting data with flexibility and continuously adjust strategies accordingly.

The following are principles of high quality assessment:

1. CLARITY OF THE LEARNING TARGET
Assessment can be made more precise, accurate and dependable of it what are to be achieved are clearly stated and feasible, Learning targets involve knowledge, reasoning, skills, products and affects stated in behavioral terms. Learning targets are something which be observed through the behavior of the students. 

2. APPROPRIATENESS OF ASSESSMENT METHOD
If the learning targets are clarified, teachers can easily identify appropriate assessment methods. For example, assessment of ability that requires demonstration of the ability must be assessed using a method that students are able to demonstrate that ability . Another example is on students writing maybe more appropriate if the learning target is for students are asked to justify their stand on a certain issue rather than responding to multiple choice questions about writing. Another example is performance assessment which is a type of assessment that requires students to actually perform, demonstrate, construct, and/or develop a product or a solution under defined conditions and standard. Performance assessments imply active student production of evidence of learning - not multiple-choice, which is essentially passive selection among preconstructed answers . Another example, if students are to identify characteristics of a particular object, then a multiple-choice test may be the best way to measure that outcome.

3. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH QUALITY ASSESSMENT


    • Validity of the TestRemember that something valid is something fair.A valid test is one that measures what it is supposed to measure. To ensure validity of the test, consider the following questions:
      • What do students think of the test? Is the test too difficult to understand? Is it easy? 
      • Am I testing the students the way I taught them? Remember that the kind of test should be based on how it was taught.
               Test can be made more valid by making it more subjective or more open.
    • Reliability of the TestReliability is the extent to which an experiment, test, or any measuring procedure yields the same result on repeated trials. This means that giving the same test to the same students is assumed to yield consistent results. This means that something reliable is something that you can trust. A reliable test is a consistent measure of what it is supposed to measure. The following questions can help you assess reliability of the test.
      • Can we trust the results of the test
      • Would we get the same results if the tests were taken again and scored by a different person?

    • Fairness. The concept that assessment should be 'fair' covers a number of aspects which the following:
      • Student Knowledge and learning targets of assessment
      • Opportunity to learn
      • Prerequisite knowledge and skills
      • Avoiding teacher stereotype
      • Avoiding bias in assessment tasks and procedures

    • Positive Consequences. Learning assessments provide students with effective feedback and potentially improve their motivation and/or self-esteem. Moreover, assessments of learning gives students the tools to assess themselves and understand how to improve. Positive consequence on students, teachers, parents, and other stakeholders 
    • Practicality and Efficiency.  Learning assessments provide students with effective feedback and potentially improve their motivation and/or self-esteem. Moreover, assessments of learning gives students the tools to assess themselves and understand how to improve.
      • Something practical is something effective in real situations.
      • A practical test is one which can be practically administered.
      • Will the test take longer to design than apply?
      • Will the test be easy to mark?
      • Tests can be made more practical by making it more objective (more controlled items)
    • Ethical Practice in AssessmentConforming to the standards of conduct of a given profession or group.Ethical issues that may be raised
      • Possible harm to the participants. 
      • Confidentiality. 
      • Presence of concealment or deception. 
      • Temptation to assist students. 
References:

1.     Frey, B. (2014). Modern Classroom Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE 

2.     ________ (2003) .Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. 

3.     Kibby, M. (2003) Assessing students online. The University of New Castle. Retrieved May 20, 2020 

4.     from http://www.newcastle.edu.au/discipline/sociol-anthrop/staff/kibbymarj/online/assess.html

5.     Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A.(2016). Assessment. British Educational Research Journal. Vol 42, No, 3, June 2016, pp. 454 – 476. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3215


Learner-Centered and Teacher-Centered Learning


Learner-centered teaching is an approach to teaching that is being advocated by contemporary theorist in education. Teachers advocating and practicing learner-centered learning  do not employ a single teaching method. This approach emphasizes a variety of different types of methods that focus on what the students are learning, it changes the role of the teachers from a provider of information to facilitating student learning. The table below shows the difference between teacher-centered and learner-centered approaches.

Teacher-CenteredLearner-Centered
Focus is on the teacherFocus is on both students and teacher
Focus is on language forms and structures (what the teacher knows about the language and how the teacher will use the language)Focus is on language use in typical situations (how students will use the language)
Teacher talks; students listenTeacher models; students interact with teacher and one another
Students work aloneStudents work in pairs, in groups, or alone depending on the purpose of the activity
Teacher monitors and corrects every student utteranceStudents talk without constant instructor monitoring; instructor provides feedback/correction when questions arise
Instructor answers students’ questions about languageStudents answer each other’s questions, using instructor as an information resource
Teacher identifies and chooses topicsStudents have some choice of topics
Teacher assess student learningStudents assess their own learning; teacher also assess
Classroom is often quietClassroom is often noisy and busy

Source: The National Capitol Language Resource Center (a project of the George Washington University)

WRITING A REFLECTIVE ESSAY

Why reflective essay? Writing a reflection paper gives you the opportunity to look back at an experience or a situation and offer you perspe...